Atornee
Get Started Free
Review My Refund Policy

Lawyer reviewed templates

refund policy review checklist uk

Refund Policy Review Checklist: What to Check Before You Sign

A refund policy review checklist for UK businesses helps you catch the clauses that cost you money, damage customer trust, or put you on the wrong side of consumer law. Whether you are reviewing your own policy before publishing it or auditing a supplier's terms before you commit, the stakes are real. UK consumer law — particularly the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and the Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013 — sets minimum standards that no refund policy can override. If your policy falls short, or if a supplier's policy strips away rights your customers are legally entitled to, you are exposed. This guide walks you through exactly what to check: the must-have clauses, the red flags that signal a poorly drafted or deliberately evasive policy, and the points where you should stop and get a solicitor involved. It is practical, UK-specific, and built for founders and ops teams who need to move quickly without getting caught out.

Review My Refund Policy
Instant Access
Lawyer Reviewed

Why this matters

Most UK businesses either copy a refund policy from a template without checking it against current law, or accept a supplier's terms without reading the refund section properly. Both are risky. A policy that contradicts the Consumer Rights Act 2015 is unenforceable — and can attract Trading Standards attention. A supplier policy with vague or missing refund terms leaves you with no recourse when something goes wrong. The real pain here is not knowing what you are agreeing to, or what you are publishing, until a dispute forces the issue. By then it is expensive and stressful to fix.

The Atornee approach

Atornee lets you upload your refund policy — or a supplier's — and get a structured review against UK consumer law standards in minutes. It flags missing clauses, highlights language that conflicts with statutory rights, and tells you plainly what is ambiguous. You are not getting a generic AI summary. You are getting a document-specific audit that tells you what is wrong, why it matters under UK law, and whether you need a solicitor to fix it. For founders without in-house legal, that is the difference between guessing and knowing.

What you get

A clause-by-clause breakdown of your refund policy against Consumer Rights Act 2015 and Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013 requirements
Clear identification of red flags — vague timelines, unlawful exclusions, missing statutory rights language — with plain-English explanations
A checklist of must-have clauses so you know exactly what is present, missing, or needs rewording
Honest escalation guidance: Atornee tells you when the issues are serious enough to warrant a solicitor rather than a DIY fix
A reusable audit framework you can apply every time you update your policy or review a new supplier's terms

Before you sign checklist

1
1. Gather the document: upload the full refund policy text, not just a summary or URL screenshot
2
2. Confirm the policy type: is this a B2C policy, a B2B policy, or a mixed-use document — the legal obligations differ significantly
3
3. Check the statutory rights baseline: verify the policy does not attempt to exclude or limit rights under the Consumer Rights Act 2015
4
4. Review the returns window: for distance selling, the minimum 14-day cancellation right under Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013 must be present and correctly described
5
5. Identify any exclusions: flag categories of goods or services listed as non-refundable and check whether those exclusions are lawful
6
6. Check the refund timeline: UK law requires refunds within 14 days of cancellation — confirm the policy reflects this and does not impose longer delays
7
7. Escalate if needed: if the policy contains broad liability exclusions, unusual dispute resolution clauses, or conflicts with your trading terms, get a solicitor to review before you publish or sign

FAQ

Does my UK business legally need a refund policy?

If you sell to consumers online or at a distance, yes — you are required under the Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013 to provide clear information about cancellation and refund rights before the customer commits to a purchase. Even for in-store sales, the Consumer Rights Act 2015 gives customers automatic rights to refunds in certain circumstances. Not having a written policy does not remove those obligations; it just makes disputes harder to manage.

What are the biggest red flags in a refund policy?

Watch for policies that say 'no refunds under any circumstances' — that is unlawful for most consumer sales in the UK. Also flag vague language like 'refunds at our discretion', missing timelines for processing refunds, and clauses that try to substitute store credit for a cash refund when the customer is entitled to one. Any policy that attempts to override statutory rights is unenforceable and potentially a Trading Standards issue.

Can a supplier's refund policy override my customers' statutory rights?

No. Statutory rights under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013 cannot be contracted out of. If a supplier's policy tries to limit your ability to pass those rights on to your customers, that clause is unenforceable. However, the practical problem is that you may still end up in a dispute about it — which is why reviewing supplier terms before you sign matters.

How often should I review my refund policy?

At minimum, review it annually and whenever you change your product range, pricing model, or sales channels. If you start selling digitally delivered goods, subscriptions, or services where you did not before, your refund obligations change. A policy written for physical goods does not automatically cover digital content correctly under UK law.

When should I get a solicitor involved rather than using a checklist?

Use a checklist for routine audits and to catch obvious issues. Get a solicitor if your policy is being challenged by a customer or Trading Standards, if you are drafting bespoke terms for a high-value or complex product, or if your policy interacts with sector-specific regulation — for example, financial services, travel, or healthcare. Atornee will flag when an issue is beyond a self-service fix.

Is a refund policy the same as terms and conditions?

Not exactly. A refund policy is often a standalone document or a dedicated section within your terms and conditions. The distinction matters because customers and regulators expect refund rights to be clearly accessible — burying them in dense T&Cs can itself be a compliance issue under the Consumer Rights Act 2015's requirement for terms to be transparent and prominent.

Related Atornee Guides

Cheap Contract Solicitor Alternative (UK)

Useful if your refund policy review uncovers broader contract issues that need a cost-effective legal fix.

Atornee Use Cases

See how UK founders and ops teams use Atornee across different document review workflows.

Cheap Solicitor for NDA (UK)

Relevant if your supplier relationship involves confidentiality obligations alongside refund terms.

External References

GOV.UK Business and Self-employed

Official UK guidance on consumer rights obligations and business compliance requirements.

UK Legislation

Primary source for the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013 — the two key statutes governing UK refund obligations.

ICO Guidance for Organisations

Relevant where refund processes involve personal data handling, particularly for online and distance selling businesses.

Trust & Verification Policy

Authored By

A

Atornee Editorial Team

UK Consumer Law and Document Review Research

Reviewed By

C

Compliance Review Desk

UK Business Legal Content QA

Last reviewed on 3/4/2026

"This content is based on analysis of common refund policy drafting errors identified across UK consumer-facing businesses and cross-referenced against the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013. It reflects practical patterns seen in document review workflows rather than theoretical legal commentary."

References & Sources